News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Veggies priced out of schools

Feds outsource, and costs soar

- Staff Writer

Published: Fri, Aug. 24, 2007 12:00AM

Modified Fri, Aug. 24, 2007 05:20AM

Bookmark and Share email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

RALEIGH -- The price of some North Carolina fruit and vegetables sold under a popular federal school lunch program has nearly doubled since the U.S. Department of Defense hired a Guilford County company to help save money.

A new $4.30-a-case surcharge is being levied by Foster-Caviness Foodservice of Colfax, a produce distributor that recently won a $37.6 million contract to supply military bases and school lunch programs across the state.

That's in addition to a 5.9 percent charge Defense Department purchasing agents were already tacking on to every fruit and vegetable transaction made under the federal "farm-to-school" program. The program subsidizes the buying of home-grown produce by more than 60 North Carolina school districts, including those in Wake, Johnston and Chatham counties.

Related Content

State agriculture officials, who are partners in the decade-old federal program that utilizes the Defense Department's immense purchasing power, say the double charge is unjustified because they have handled deliveries, acted as a middleman on contracts and billing, lined up farmers and negotiated a price for the produce.

They liken the twin charges to inflated prices the Defense Department has paid military contractors for routine purchases.

"Schools will be buying a $200 hammer," said Gary Gay, director of the food distribution program at the N.C. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. "My phone is ringing off the hook with schools calling us, saying 'I can no longer afford to buy North Carolina produce.' "

As a result of the added expense, some North Carolina school officials say they will be able to buy only about half as much Tar Heel-fresh watermelons, apples, strawberries or sweet potatoes under the farm-to-school program as they did last year. Other school districts may decide to drop out altogether.

"It's quite a hefty increase, and it makes us question whether it is worth continuing," said Beth Taylor, director of child nutrition for Johnston County schools, which bought about $90,000 of fresh produce from the program last year. "We've really enjoyed the program and felt it was supporting the North Carolina farmer."

State Agriculture Commissioner Steve Troxler and members of North Carolina's Congressional delegation are angry about the extra fee. Urged on by Troxler, Reps. Walter Jones, a Farmville Republican, and Bob Etheridge, a Lillington Democrat, have demanded an explanation from Defense Department purchasing agents and pressed them to attend a meeting Tuesday in Raleigh.

"This makes no sense at all to me," said Etheridge, a Harnett County farmer and member of the House Agriculture Committee. "Somewhere along the line, someone's guilty -- and we're going to find out who."

Jones said the increased cost doesn't seem justified, considering the free services provided by Gay's office and other state agriculture officials. "We will get to the bottom of this," Jones said.

In a voice-mail message, Paul Lieb, president and owner of Foster-Caviness, declined a request for a phone interview.

"We're excited about the program, and we are very much committed to North Carolina growers," Lieb said in his voice-mail message. "It's a big undertaking. It's going to be a good thing, hopefully, for my business, a good thing for North Carolina and a good thing for North Carolina schools."

Before now, the program was touted as a success both for North Carolina growers who have a tough time penetrating institutional food-purchasing programs dominated by bigger agricultural states and nutritionists who like adding fresh fruits and vegetables to the student menu.

Staff writer Jim Nesbitt can be reached at (919) 829-8955 or jim.nesbitt@newsobserver.com.

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.