News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Board revives pesticide case

- Staff Writer

Published: Wed, Mar. 12, 2008 12:30AM

Modified Wed, Mar. 12, 2008 02:24AM

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

Tomato grower Ag-Mart will face a new hearing this summer to determine whether it exposed its field workers to toxic chemicals in pesticides sprayed on crops.

The state pesticide board voted Tuesday to hear evidence on the charges in July, prolonging a case that has already stretched over three years.

Ag-Mart, a Florida company that grows grape tomatoes in Brunswick County, was charged in 2005 with 369 violations of state pesticide law, touching off the largest pesticide prosecution in state history.

State investigators say the company forced workers to illegally labor in fields freshly sprayed with chemicals, some of which were linked to birth defects and other serious side effects. One of Ag-Mart's former workers, who gave birth to a child with no arms and legs, is now suing the company.

Ag-Mart officials say they never illegally exposed workers. They say that state investigators misread its work records, a misunderstanding that led to hundreds of false charges.

Two judges have agreed with the company's argument, recommending that all but 17 of the charges be dropped and fining the company $6,000. The judges were asked by the pesticide board to hear the case when the board said the case was too complicated for it to handle.

On Tuesday, the pesticide board largely rejected the judges' recommendations and resurrected the case.

The board voted to fine the company $21,000 for 42 violations, which included improper use and storage of pesticides, and to revoke the pesticide applicator license of Ag-Mart manager Jeffrey Oxley.

Members also agreed to hold their own hearing on 202 of the most serious charges, all of which involve employee exposure.

Lawyers for Ag-Mart said they haven't decided whether to fight the fine, and they said they were surprised by the board's decision to hold another hearing on a case that has been examined by two judges.

"They said before that they weren't qualified to sort through days worth of evidence," said Mitch Armbruster, a Raleigh lawyer who represents Ag-Mart. "Now they're going to hold the hearing themselves. I'm a little perplexed."

kristin.collins@newsobserver.com or (919) 829-4881

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.