News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Taxman may come for Wake's cats, dogs

- Staff Writer

Published: Sat, Mar. 15, 2008 12:30AM

Modified Sat, Mar. 15, 2008 04:36AM

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

Wake County wants to put a tax on dogs and cats of up to $30 a year -- an idea that is making some veterinarians, pet owners and animal advocates bristle.

Under a proposal that county commissioners still must approve, the annual tax would start in July and be levied on every dog and cat. The licensing tax would be $15 for a dog or cat that had been spayed or neutered; $30 for non-fixed canines and felines. Residents could get a bargain on three-year licenses -- $40 for fixed animals; $80 for those not spayed or neutered.

If all of the estimated 86,000 county pets were licensed, Wake would take in $2.5 million annually and the tax would replace pet license fees in Raleigh, Cary and Garner.

Veterinarians administering rabies vaccinations would be required to report whether a dog or cat had been licensed. That has some vets saying they don't want to be the taxman's snitch.

"As a veterinarian, I consider myself to be a family health practitioner, not a revenue collector for the county or the city," said Joe Gordon, a vet with Oberlin Animal Hospital in Raleigh.

He and the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Wake County also fear that the requirement would result in more owners deciding not to take their dog or cat to the vet for care.

"People are going to fly under the radar on this," said Hope Hancock, executive director of SPCA of Wake County. "It's going to be a dissuasive factor to go see a vet."

She said the SPCA is in favor of a countywide fee, but it doesn't like the role veterinarians would be forced to play.

County officials, vets and the SPCA agree on the tax's goal -- encouraging pet owners to spay and neuter their animals.

Funded by owners

The proposal, an initiative from the county's public service department, is still in the draft stages. It must be vetted by the Wake environmental services board before being presented to county commissioners. The ordinance also would have a public hearing, but no date has been set.

The tax, which is double Raleigh's existing pet fees, would shift part of the fiscal burden of animal services to pet owners and away from the county's general fund.

Tommy Esqueda, Wake's director of environmental services, expects pet owners would be slow to comply -- only 10 percent in the first year. The department wants the program to reach 50 percent compliance in five years. If animal control officers tracked down a pet that hadn't been taxed, its owner would be hit with a $100 fine.

The pet tax is based on a decade-old plan used in New Hanover County, which has seen almost 80 percent of pet owners pay registration fees, said Jane McNeil, director of the coastal county's animal services. Fees from licensing and other services pay almost all of her department's $900,000 operating budget.

Esqueda hopes the tax would pay for more employees for an understaffed animal control department and to fund some of the county's $4 million animal shelter expansion, which is also slated to begin in July.

Elsewhere in the Triangle, Orange and Durham counties use rabies cards to track owners and charge similar two-tiered rates. The rate for spayed and neutered pets in both counties is lower than the rates in Wake's proposed tax.

Pets could be spurned

Sherry Hill is leery. Three years ago, she and her husband, Len, adopted Ruffin, a white Samoyed puppy they found abandoned by Shelley Lake in North Raleigh.

If the tax goes through, Hill thinks more owners won't take their pets to the vet. They might orphan their dog or cat -- just as Ruffin was.

"You know how people get animals, and if there's anything like cost or responsibility that they weren't expecting, they just abandon them," she said.

sam.lagrone@newsobserver.com or (919) 836-4951

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.