'); } -->
Raleigh leaders quickly reaffirmed their support last week for turning the George's Mews apartment complex off Glenwood Avenue near downtown into housing for low-income workers.
As a result, a nonprofit developer's proposal to purchase the complex now heads back to the Wake County Board of Commissioners, who are expected to take it up at their Oct. 6 meeting.
The commissioners tabled the proposal at their last meeting and asked the Raleigh City Council to hold a public hearing on it.
The City Council, which met the day after the commissioners made the request, held no public hearing and voted 7-1 to reaffirm their support of the proposed purchase by Community Alternatives for Supportive Abodes, which wants to turn George's Mews' 26 one-bedroom apartments into a mix of rent-controlled apartments and housing for the disabled.
The county commissioner who most insisted on the city having a public hearing was Joe Bryan, the board's chairman. Bryan, on an economic-development recruitment trip to China, could not be reached for comment.
But Commissioner Betty Lou Ward said she doesn't think the project is doomed just because Raleigh didn't hold a public hearing. "I don't think it's a deal breaker," she said.
Ward said she wants to talk to Debra King, CASA's executive director, before deciding how she'll vote on the issue.
Ward also said that she doesn't agree with some the arguments against the project, particularly the idea that it would hurt property values in the Glenwood-Brooklyn neighborhood.
"If it does move forward, I don't think the neighbors will notice anything appreciably different," she said.
CASA's proposal to buy George's Mews for $2.14 million would be funded by the city, Wake County and state agencies. Raleigh's City Council has already agreed to contribute $926,164. The county is being asked to provide $566,500.
The project has sparked a vigorous public debate about the effects of such housing on neighborhoods, and about the process by which the city funds different affordable housing projects around the city. Advocates for the disabled and for affordable housing have argued in favor of CASA's project, while a number of Glenwood-Brooklyn residents have come out against it.
The Historic Glenwood/Brooklyn Neighborhood Association recently polled its members to see if they supported the project.
Jennifer Attride, the association's president, said 56 of the 81 members opposed the project on the grounds that it is not in line with the city's "scattered site" affording housing policy, which is designed to avoid concentrating assisted-rental housing in minority and low-income neighborhoods.
CASA already operates a Cleveland Street quadruplex a block from George's Mews.
But other Glenwood-Brooklyn residents remain worried about the sorts of people that would move in to the apartments after CASA takes over.
Philip Isley, who was the only council member to vote against the project last week, said many residents have contacted him with questions about who would qualify to live in George's Mews.
During last week's meeting, Isley asked King, CASA's executive director, whether felony drug dealers would be allowed to live in the complex.
King said CASA's tenants undergo criminal background checks, and that such drug charges would have had to happen a "really long time ago" in a person's history for CASA to consider accepting them.
"I was not comfortable with the answers she gave me," Isley said later. "I'm not convinced they have a plan of who can and can't be there."
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.