News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Power decisions

Editorials

Published: Mar 16, 2008 12:30 AM
Modified: Mar 16, 2008 05:55 AM

Power decisions

 

Story Tools

Advertisements
You'd think that a major court ruling, on a subject as high-profile as the Clean Air Act, had been issued in the dark of night. A group of 19 environmental organizations has asked the state Division of Air Quality to require Duke Energy to install the latest pollution controls on its new Cliffside power plant, based on that ruling. The division's response: "We'll study the request."

The ruling was issued last month by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The case stems from a controversial decision on the part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to scrap a policy requiring utilities to install best-available technology to reduce mercury emissions. The court said the EPA was wrong and that utilities must find the most effective technology to scrub out mercury, a powerful neurotoxin to humans, especially infants and children.

The N.C. Utilities Commission approved Duke's new Cliffside coal-burning plant last year, and the air quality division approved a permit for its operation before the D.C. Circuit's ruling was issued. To Duke's credit, it had planned to use technology that would remove as much as 90 percent of mercury emissions. It may be possible, with existing technology, to increase that to 98 percent. That's a significant difference.

Construction of the plant is just starting. For the sake of public health and in Duke's own financial interest, the division should promptly ensure that the company is acting to comply with federal law.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.

Get $150+ in coupons in every Sunday N&O. Click here for convenient home delivery.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company