'); } -->
With North Carolina becoming a population magnet, local governments have begged the legislature for more ways to raise money to meet the demands of growth, especially infrastructure. A sensible option is a real estate transfer tax, which imposes a small levy on the sale of homes, buildings and land. Yet that option was blocked until last year by a well-financed homebuilder and real estate lobby that loves profits from the in-migration but is perfectly content with letting communities figure out on their own how to pay for needs.
When a bill finally did pass last year, allowing a transfer tax or a quarter-point increase in the local sales tax, it did so with the shackles that the taxes had to be be approved by local voters. Legislators don't give the public a vote when state taxes (or county property taxes) need to be raised. But such was the power of the opposition.
Orange County recently decided on a transfer tax and -- no surprise -- voters overwhelmingly defeated it. In all, 17 counties have put the matter on ballots since last fall, and all have failed. The sour economy may have played a role this week, but the same interests that arm-twisted the House and Senate also were active on the local level. The Orange commissioners, for instance, spent $100,000 to tell voters how the tax proceeds would be used for schools and parks. A group backed by real estate associations that opposed the tax spent double that, with $18,000 left over.
By passing the law last year, legislators acknowledged that communities need new sources of income. Raising property taxes, one of the few sources of revenue for counties, eventually becomes onerous, especially on elderly residents and those on the financial edge.
The legislature needs to finish the job, by giving county commissioners -- looking at their budget and infrastructure needs -- authority to levy the transfer tax without a referendum. As long as the tax is capped (it's currently at 0.4 percent), voters would have the time-honored ability at the next election to decide if their representatives had raised revenues rightly.
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.