News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Leverage for the public

Editorials

Published: Sep 10, 2007 12:00 AM
Modified: Sep 10, 2007 06:19 AM

Leverage for the public

 

Story Tools

Advertisements
North Carolina has a strong tool - a legal crowbar, if you wish - that members of the public can use to pry loose information from the government that, by law, is supposed to be a matter of public record. But there's a problem: Sometimes the crowbar becomes too heavy to lift.

That is the drawback in relying on citizens to invoke, through legal action or the threat of same, the state's public records law, while knowing full well that they may have to bear every nickel of the expense themselves. Did we say nickel? In fact, the expense of hiring an attorney and pursuing a public records lawsuit can run into the thousands of dollars.

The county commissioners or town council members who stonewall a records request can use taxpayers' money to fight their legal battle. But the aggrieved resident who takes on City Hall does so with no guarantee that his legal fees will be reimbursed if he prevails. Judges are empowered to make such awards, but in practice most successful public records plaintiffs wind up bearing most of the cost of their efforts.

John Bussian, a lobbyist for the N.C. Press Association, noted in a recent N&O article that Florida and Texas are among the states that provide for automatic reimbursement of a plaintiff's legal fees when a court rules that there was a public records violation. That would be a sensible reform in North Carolina.

Would news organizations that pursue public records suits stand to save some money? Doubtless so. But in matters such as this, the press acts as a surrogate for the public at large in ferreting out information that is supposed to be available.

It would be logical for a government that thumbed its nose at the public records statute to have to cover the prevailing party's legal expenses, whether that party was a newspaper, TV station or citizen acting on his or her own.

Anyway, a news organization doing its duty won't be deterred by the prospect of paying a lawyer. Private citizens might be. Allowing them to recover expenses if they win in court would make it far easier for them to wield the government accountability tool that's wisely been provided.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company