Naomi Lambert: Judging GOP agenda
08/30/2014 8:00 PM
08/29/2014 3:34 PM
In reference to your Aug. 17 news article “ GOP moves to restrict challenges of N.C. laws” and Aug. 19 editorial “ A curb on rights”: I believe the appointment of three-judge panels is a distraction from the underlying problems needing to be addressed.
First, if a law is ill-conceived and badly drafted as so many have been, it is bound to be hard to implement and prone to objections by those constituencies affected by it. This is not the fault of the legal system but rather of the General Assembly, which has rushed through too many major “reforms” with inadequate debate and review.
Second, attempts to inveigle the judiciary in politics undermine all aspects of our government. In the courts, we need wise, intelligent minds who can review evidence and be dispassionate in their thoughtful conclusions.
Furthermore, cuts to the administration of the courts do damage to efficiencies which make proper conduct of cases even more problematic.
What to do? When we vote for judges, make sure we have done our homework and can be sure the track record of those running matches our personal priorities.
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.