News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Columns by Ted Vaden

Columns by Ted Vaden

Published: Aug 27, 2006 12:00 AM
Modified: Aug 27, 2006 07:12 AM

True-to-life images in the photographs?

Tiger Woods
The color-corrected version that ran in print is on the left. Right, A more accurately color-corected version.
 

Story Tools

Advertisements


< Previous page

It's easy to understand how that can happen. The imaging department of four people handles 300 to 400 pictures a day -- not all of which are published -- and, especially on deadline at night, things get hectic.

There is supposed to be a quality control system behind the photographers and image techs to make sure those errors don't happen. Robert Miller, The N&O's director of photography, says every image is reviewed by a photo editor, as well as page designers and copy editors.

In fact, one of the N&O photo editors noticed the doctored Charlotte Observer photograph when it was transmitted over a photo wire, even before The Observer published the picture and the apology. The N&O didn't run the picture. "If that had been our own, we would have had a conversation with the photographer" before publishing, Miller said. "Sometimes, people can go overboard because they get carried away with the art of the image and not the content. So you have an editor to prevent it from happening."

The N&O, like most papers, has a written photo policy to guide its photojournalists and other news staff. It says, in part, "We do not manipulate photographs. The only electronic adjustment that should be made to news photographs is to improve the reproduction of the image so it more closely matches the color and lighting of the actual situation." The policy also forbids staging of photos or setting up situations for a photographer.

In the case of Tiger's cap, the problem was an issue of quality control, not journalistic integrity. But it does show how easy it is to adjust reality to the point that readers notice. The result was that the photo was wrong, just as misspellings or incorrect names can make a story wrong. In fact, the effect on credibility can be greater with photos than stories, because pictures have such an impact on readers.

"We want to shoot reality, not what we might want to see," Miller said. "We know that readers give us a lot of trust. They trust that we show reality, and that's what's most important to us."


< Previous page

The Public Editor can be reached at ted.vaden@newsobserver.com or by calling (919) 836-5700.

Get $150+ in coupons in every Sunday N&O. Click here for convenient home delivery.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company