News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Politics

Published: Apr 24, 2008 12:30 AM
Modified: Apr 24, 2008 05:09 AM

Voters wonder who can fix economy

In distressed Burlington, road ahead is unclear

Story Tools


Audio: Linda Bright talks about the changes in the neighborhood where her beauty salon is located.

Audio: Paulette Pride talks about why she supports Sen. Hillary Clinton.

Audio: Jason Stanfield talks about his inability to decide between the two candidates.

WHAT IS NAFTA?

The North American Free Trade Agreement eliminated most import taxes on goods moving among the United States, Canada and Mexico. The treaty was passed under the administration of Bill Clinton on Nov. 20, 1993. Critics say it has cost the United States hundreds of thousands of jobs and hurt many industries. Supporters say it has improved the economies of the three nations.

WHAT THE CANDIDATES SAY

Both Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton have called for NAFTA to be reformed -- and in similar ways. Obama says he would call for stronger enforcement of trade agreements and set benchmarks for environmental and labor provisions in new agreements. Clinton has also said she would strengthen enforcement and that she would double the size of the U.S. trade representative's enforcement unit.

HOW THEY VOTED

Neither candidate was in Congress when NAFTA passed. Both Clinton and Obama voted against the Central American Free Trade Agreement. Neither cast a vote for or against a trade pact with Peru last year. Both voted for an agreement with Oman in 2006.

Sen. John McCain voted for NAFTA and has said that overall it has benefited the country and that free trade is good for the economy. He did not cast a vote on the Peru trade pact but has consistently voted for trade agreements.

PROJECT VOTE SMART (WWW.VOTESMART.ORG) CANDIDATE STATEMENTS, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Advertisements


< Previous page

Joe Lutz, vice president for human resources at Gold Toe/Moretz, says that because of NAFTA the socks knitted in Mexico and shipped back to the United States are tariff-free, saving the company money and giving customers cheaper prices.

But it isn't just NAFTA, he said. "It's global competition."

In the past five years, about 76,000 workers in North Carolina have lost their jobs to foreign trade, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Alamance County has seen its share of the pain, with manufacturing jobs here falling more than 40 percent this decade. The unemployment rate was 5.7 percent in February -- a touch above the 5.4 percent rate the previous year.

Mac Williams, president of the Chamber of Commerce, said Burlington is trying to turn it around with new industries. The county's largest employer is LabCorp, a medical testing company with more than 3,000 workers and the steel frame of a new plant rising near the town airport.

Flashes of hope

In the shadow of the dying mill, some feel a little hope.

Bright, the hair stylist, looked out her shop window and said she would love to see LabCorp put its jobs in that old brick mill.

"If LabCorp buys it, it will upper this whole entire area," Bright said.

And of course, Bill Clinton was in Elon to say that all isn't lost. Manufacturing jobs can come back, he said in his speech to hundreds of college students. He spoke about manufacturing for about 60 seconds.

"The economy is in terrible shape," he said.

Riley, the mill worker losing her job, said she's already in bankruptcy.

Her daughter and three grandchildren live with her, and she must provide for them too.

She started her beat-up Chevy Corsica for her second job in the kitchen of a nursing home, wondering how she'll pay the bills when the knitting machines go quiet this summer.


< Previous page

bbarrett@mcclatchydc.com or (202) 383-0012
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company