News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Dems: ICE should focus on criminals, not workers

- Washington Correspondent

Published: Wed, Jun. 25, 2008 12:30AM

Modified Wed, Jun. 25, 2008 05:03AM

Bookmark and Share email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

WASHINGTON -- While the nation's immigration officers have increasingly raided job sites, hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants sit in prisons. Yet rather than being deported, they often are released into the community.

This week in Congress, Democrats -- with little resistance from Republicans -- are trying to force the Bush administration to focus more on the criminals and less on the working folk. They want to give $800 million to Immigration and Customs Enforcement so the agency can try harder to deport illegal immigrants who have committed crimes.

That would mean more money for ferreting out criminals in North Carolina's jails and prisons, for a growing partnership between federal immigration authorities and county sheriffs, and for federal squads that hunt fugitives.

WHAT IS 287(G)?

According to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act "authorizes the secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to enter into agreements with state and local law enforcement agencies, permitting designated officers to perform immigration law enforcement functions ... provided that the local law enforcement officers receive appropriate training and function under the supervision of sworn U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers."

WWW.ICE.GOV

FUNDING BREAKDOWN

The House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday unanimously approved the homeland security spending bill for fiscal year 2009, shepherded by U.S. Rep. David Price of Chapel Hill. The bill's next stop is the full House floor.

Price wanted to focus about $800 million on rounding up illegal immigrants who have committed crimes and told Immigration and Customs Enforcement that those deportations should be top priority.

Here's the breakdown of how that money would be spent:

* The department's Criminal Alien Program, focusing on jailed or imprisoned aliens, $189 million

* Hunting fugitives, $226 million

* State and local programs, including 287(g) partnerships, $78 million

* Immigration investigations, $164 million

* Other criminal investigations, $41 million

* Additional funding, $55 million

HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE

The effort was pushed this week by U.S. Rep. David Price, who, in his second year at the helm of the Homeland Security spending panel, is trying to increase his influence over the agency's immigration policies.

Price, a Chapel Hill Democrat, is shepherding through next year's spending package for the Department of Homeland Security. It passed a key House committee Tuesday and now goes to the House floor. The full House is expected to vote on the measure later this summer.

This week's work continues a theme Price has been sounding since becoming a subcommittee chairman in 2007. Last year, he battled to spend money helping federal officials search local jails to find illegal immigrants who have committed crimes.

This spring, Price slammed federal immigration enforcement chief Julie Myers for not doing enough with the money on hand.

"It's one thing everybody agrees on that has to be at the top of the list -- and yet they haven't done it," Price said in an interview Tuesday.

A burst of workplace raids

But, in fact, not everyone agrees.

"What he's saying is he doesn't want to enforce our immigration laws except on a narrow group of people," said Steven Camarota, research director of the Center for Immigration Studies, a Washington think tank that advocates for less immigration. "He's saying he doesn't really want the law enforced."

To truly ferret out illegal immigrants, Camarota said, the government must focus on workers and the employers who hire them.

That happened last year.

Federal immigration agents increased their workplace arrests of non-criminals by 816 percent in 2007 over 2003, scooping up 4,077 illegal immigrants without criminal records, according to numbers the agency provided the House Appropriations Committee.

Among those were raids at Smithfield Packing's slaughterhouse in Tar Heel, N.C., in January and August 2007. More than 50 people were arrested.

Many of those jailed and deported left behind U.S.-born children, a reality borne out in other raids that has horrified immigrant advocacy groups.

In the same period, deportations of criminal aliens increased only 16 percent.

Price said that isn't enough.

"The department should be as zealous in deporting criminals as it is in disrupting immigrant employment," Price said. "In fact, it should be more zealous."

Sheriffs want in

The policy could have a sweeping impact in North Carolina, home to one of the country's fastest-growing immigrant populations.

The federal 287(g) program, which deputizes local law enforcement officers as federal immigration cops, is picking up in popularity among urban sheriff's departments. Wake County will soon begin participating.

And Republican Sen. Elizabeth Dole, who is running for re-election, has spent the past year shoring up support among rural sheriffs for a statewide program to help smaller counties share information with federal authorities. Immigration enforcement has become a key issue in her race against Democratic state Sen. Kay Hagan.

bbarrett@mcclatchydc.com or (202) 383-0012

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.