'); } -->
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Edward Kennedy needs Marna Vasquez, and vice versa.
Vasquez is a packing-house worker from Porterville, in California's San Joaquin Valley. Kennedy is a rich and famous Democratic senator from Massachusetts.
Nonetheless, the 37-year-old former illegal immigrant and the 75-year-old lawmaker briefly shared a Capitol Hill stage last week to push for sweeping immigration revisions. Vasquez needs Kennedy's bill to help her friends and neighbors. He needs her voice to persuade congressional fence-sitters.
"I have a lot of faith that we're going to win," Vasquez said. "That's how we feel."
But there are strong feelings on all sides of the immigration debate, which resumes Tuesday in the Senate. The long-term prospects remain unclear. Vasquez's walk-on role helps raise the curtain, showcases Capitol Hill tactics and reveals a human face behind the policy dispute.
Spanning 762 pages, the complicated measure would offer legal status to illegal immigrants in the United States, now estimated to number some 12 million. It also would add border protections and establish new guest-worker programs.
About two dozen amendments await what supporters call "the grand bargain." Some are innocuous, such as a proposal to fund "refugee scholars." Some are intended to sabotage the bill, such as a proposal to prohibit the newly legal immigrants from obtaining permanent legal U.S. residency.
The immigration fight spans many fronts.
Some are formal set pieces, such as the Senate debate itself. Some have the potential to be far more influential, such as private deal-making among senators. Some fill the airwaves, such as the ads running in Kentucky urging Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell to oppose the bill.
Then there's the multifaceted bit of theater known as the news conference.
Late Thursday morning, Vasquez donned a red United Farm Workers T-shirt to stand with Kennedy, UFW President Arturo Rodriquez and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. Before a dozen camera crews, speakers cheered on an agricultural guest-worker program that's included in the comprehensive immigration bill.
Dubbed AgJobs, the package would grant U.S. residency to 1.5 million illegal immigrants with farm experience.
"Real fruit requires real people," Rodriguez said.
Vasquez and a Porterville friend, Angebala Zabala, left Los Angeles by train a week ago. They were later joined by about 100 other farmworkers and immigrants on the so-called Dreams Across America Tour.
Supported by churches and unions, the trip delivered immigrants to Washington for nearly a week's worth of public and private lobbying. It was Vasquez's first trip to the capital, where strangers have shaped her life.
In 1986, Kennedy helped write the Immigration Reform and Control Act, which offered amnesty to more than 2.7 million illegal immigrants. That same year, Vaquez and her mother entered the United States illegally in a harrowing journey.
Crossing the border
"We walked for 24 hours," Vasquez said in an interview. "The temperature was 120 degrees. One of the guides -- the coyote -- was screaming at us, saying, 'You have to go, you have to run.' We didn't have water. We didn't have food."
Her voice cracked slightly, and she apologized. It's hard to remember, she said.
Critics charge that the 1986 law's amnesty provisions became a magnet that attracted even more illegal immigrants. Feinstein herself, before she decided to support AgJobs, cautioned that "this is going -- mark my words -- to be a huge magnet" that boosts illegal immigration.
Amnesty will be much discussed during the Senate debate that resumes Tuesday, but Vasquez won't have much time to watch it on C-SPAN. Now a naturalized U.S. citizen, she'll be back at the packing house, working hard, she said, to send money to her brothers back in Mexico.
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.