News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Senate OKs border security deal

The $3 billion plan brings back part of the GOP's ideas from the failed immigration bill

- The Associated Press

Published: Fri, Jul. 27, 2007 12:00AM

Modified Fri, Jul. 27, 2007 05:52AM

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

WASHINGTON -- Senate Democrats and Republicans agreed Thursday to devote an additional $3 billion to gaining control over the U.S.-Mexico border.

The move puts Congress on a path to overriding President Bush's promised veto of a $38 billion homeland security spending bill.

The deal, approved by an 89-1 vote, resurrects a GOP plan to pass some of the most popular parts of Bush's failed immigration bill. It includes money for additional Border Patrol agents and fencing along the southern border.

WHAT'S IN THE BILL?

The deal passed 89-1 in the Senate Thursday would pay to:

HIRE AND TRAIN 23,000 Border Patrol agents and 1,200 Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents

FINISH the construction of 700 miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border previously authorized by Congress.

ADD 45,000 detention beds, four unmanned aerial vehicles, and 105 ground-based radar and camera towers.

COX NEWS SERVICE

Democrats liked the money. But they objected to Republican proposals such as allowing law enforcement officers to question people about their immigration status and cracking down on people who overstay their visas.

Efforts broke down Wednesday to make progress on a compromise containing only the border security money.

But Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, resolved their differences overnight and announced agreement Thursday morning. Cornyn won a promise to use some money to pursue immigrants who had entered the United States legally but had overstayed their visas.

Reid had apparently thought that Cornyn wanted harsher language.

"I was wrong and Senator Cornyn was right," Reid acknowledged.

The measure was initially opposed by the White House, top Republicans said, and it clearly puts the president in a box. Bush had promised a veto of the overall homeland security bill for spending $2.3 billion more than he requested.

But the White House signaled it would at least accept the added money for the border.

"To the extent Congress supports additional emergency funding, we want to work with them to make sure it is spent on the highest border security priorities," White House spokesman Scott Stanzel said.

Now, Bush's stalwarts in Congress, including Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., are poised to override the president's veto on the entire bill.

Cornyn predicted the bill would "pass by a veto-proof margin" and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told reporters the bill might get 90 votes in the 100-member Senate.

The measure probably will be the first spending bill for the budget year beginning Oct. 1 that will arrive on Bush's desk. The president, however, demanded on Thursday that the Democratic-controlled Congress focus on delivering the Pentagon's budget to him before lawmakers take their August vacation.

Bush and Republicans such as Graham and Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona had argued during last month's immigration debate that a comprehensive approach to overhauling immigration policy was the only way to attract bipartisan support.

The bill was condemned by conservative talk radio and congressional foes as offering "amnesty." After it failed to pass, Graham and others changed their minds and offered the border security plan.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.