News & Observer | newsobserver.com | N.C. leaders at odds over jobs

Published: Aug 31, 2007 12:00 AM
Modified: Aug 31, 2007 04:53 AM

N.C. leaders at odds over jobs

Gov. Mike Easley vetoes legislation and offers his own plan to ensure that companies don't cut jobs after getting incentives

Story Tools

Advertisements
North Carolina leaders want to open a new front in the battle for jobs by shifting attention -- and money -- to saving existing ones. First they've got to resolve a fight over how to do it.

On Thursday, Gov. Mike Easley vetoed legislation approved by the General Assembly to push his own plan. The legislature in late July passed a bill that would give Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. as much as $40 million to upgrade a plant in Fayetteville. Goodyear could have gotten the money even if it cut 750 jobs.

"I cannot, in good conscience, pay $40 million of taxpayers' money to a company to lay off 700 workers," Easley said at a news conference to announce his veto, his eighth since taking office in 2001. "We just can't do that as a state and act like we have any sense."

The governor touted his own proposal, which would give grants to large manufacturers that agree to upgrade and maintain all existing jobs. He said that the plan, which he wants the legislature to take up when it reconvenes in May, would require more accountability. Based on state data, Easley's proposal could benefit, at most, six North Carolina factories.

A looming battle

Easley's action sets up a clash with the General Assembly, which likely will come back for a special session early in September to consider overriding the veto. The House would do just that if it voted now, said Speaker Joe Hackney, an Orange County Democrat, who added that Easley's decision disappointed him.

"I don't believe Goodyear is intending to cut jobs. In fact, they may be adding jobs," Hackney told reporters Thursday. "We've had great difficulty working with them [Easley's administration] on this. ... We really wish he had worked with us earlier to help craft the bill instead of doing it this way."

To override the veto, three-fifths of members present would have to approve. The House acts first and, if it agrees to an override, the Senate gets the bill for consideration. The legislature is likely to reconvene Sept. 10 or 11, Hackney said.

Mark Basnight, a Manteo Democrat who leads the Senate, will wait to see what action the House takes, a spokesman said.

Rethinking the basics

That the governor and legislature are even considering incentives to maintain employers -- and employment -- marks a fundamental shift in the way the state approaches economic development. In the past, North Carolina officials, armed with lucrative tax breaks, grants and other perks, have courted companies with new jobs. Now, they're working on aid to get big manufacturers to upgrade and stay put, regardless of whether they add positions.

"One of the things we're going to have to do is take some elephants and turn them into gazelles and that means significant investment by a lot of these plants," Easley said. "We hope that it will result in more employees."

North Carolina has been forced into a painful transition as manufacturing, a driver of the economy for much of the last century, declined in the face of cheaper competition overseas. This decade alone, more than 200,000 factory jobs have disappeared.

State and local governments have offered well in excess of $500 million in tax breaks and other aid to attract companies such as Dell and Google to the hardest-hit regions. Some have complained that the state would have been better served offering similar concessions to manufacturers so that they could have retooled and let North Carolina avoid some of the pain altogether.

The state has helped some existing businesses. Companies such as Cree, a manufacturer in Durham, and Quintiles, a medical researcher in Durham, received incentives for expansion. But they won assistance for creating new jobs, not just keeping existing ones.


Next page >

Staff writer Jonathan B. Cox can be reached at 836-4948 or jonathan.cox@newsobserver.com.
Researcher Brooke Cain and Charlotte Observer reporter Mark Johnson contributed.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company