'); } -->
WASHINGTON -- Americans still believe it's important for a president to have strong religious beliefs, a new study by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life shows.
So who have those same Americans made into the front-runners in the 2008 presidential race? Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton and Republican Rudy Giuliani -- the very candidates they see as less religious than the others, according to the study.
And, it shows, the candidate viewed as the most religious -- Republican Mitt Romney -- is handicapped by his religion.
Percentage of those polled who called candidates included in the survey "very religious":
DEMOCRATS
John Edwards28
Barack Obama24
Hillary Rodham Clinton16
REPUBLICANS
Mitt Romney46
John McCain19
Fred Thompson16
Rudy Giuliani14
By comparison, 43 percent said President Bush is very religious.
PEW FORUM ON RELIGION AND PUBLIC LIFE
"Romney, more than any other candidate, is viewed as highly religious," the Pew study said. "Yet the political benefit he stands to gain from being perceived as very religious is limited by the reservations that some Americans have about voting for a Mormon."
NO CLEAR-CUT BENEFIT
The findings are the latest to acknowledge the challenge faced by Romney, a former Massachusetts governor, as he tries to become the nation's first Mormon president.
A quarter of respondents said they would be less likely to vote for a Mormon presidential candidate.
"So far, religion is not proving to be a clear-cut positive in the 2008 presidential campaign," the study concluded.
COULD BE WORSE
Mormons were viewed more favorably than two other categories of people, however. Forty-five percent of respondents said they would be less likely to vote for a Muslim candidate, and 61 percent said they would be less likely to back a candidate who doesn't believe in God.
ABOUT THE STUDY
The Pew study is based on interviews with 3,002 people questioned Aug. 1-18 and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 2 percentage points.
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.