News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Court gets year-round school appeal

Published: Jan 10, 2008 12:00 AM
Modified: Jan 10, 2008 11:16 AM

Court gets year-round school appeal

The decision on how Wake structures its school year will affect many students

Story Tools


Hear attorney Ann Majestic, representing the Wake County School Board, make arguments before the Court of Appeals.


Hear Justice Martha Geer question attorney Robert Hunter, council for Wake CARES, make argument before the Court of Appeals.


Hear Justice Geer question Hunter about the length of a school year.


Hear Majestic's rebuttal to Hunter's argument.

Advertisements
RALEIGH - Thousands of students could be forced to return to year-round schools as early as this summer if Wake County education leaders can win an appellate court ruling.

Lawyers for the school system and a parent group argued before the state Court of Appeals on Wednesday whether parents need to give permission for their children to attend year-round schools.

If the school district gets a favorable ruling in the next two months, school board members say they may not seek permission to send students to year-round schools this summer. That would sweep in 2,900 students who left year-round schools this year.

"Once we get a ruling, we'll have to look at all our options," said Rosa Gill, chairwoman of the school board. "We haven't made a decision yet."

The school district is currently limited by a lower court ruling in May that requires parental permission for assignment to year-round schools.

Wake complied with the ruling this school year by mailing letters to parents of more than 30,500 students, asking for consent to send their children to year-round schools, as well as those that follow a modified calendar. Students whose parents declined to grant the consent were sent to traditional-calendar schools.

School officials said 90 percent of the families gave their consent. But the refusals of 2,900 students were enough to create crowding at traditional-calendar schools. It also left many empty seats in year-round schools.

School officials think the consent forms cover only one year so parents would have to opt out again to stay out of year-round schools for this fall.

School administrators say they're not basing their new reassignment plan, which was released Tuesday, on whether they'll win or lose the appeal.

But they're not planning to send consent forms and recommend traditional-calendar assignments until at least March. They say they want to know first the results of a lottery in which parents can apply in February to attend magnet schools, year-round schools or traditional-calendar schools.

Initially, only 900 families applied to pull their children from year-round schools last year. Critics say parents who wanted their children to attend traditional-calendar schools could only apply to an online lottery. As a result, many parents didn't know they had an option. After the court ruling, many more families opted out of year-round schools.

Families that apply in February have no guarantee that their application will be accepted. If they're rejected, they'd be able to get out of a year-round school by saying no on the consent form.

But the consent forms could become a moot point if the Court of Appeals rules on Wake's appeal before the letters are sent. The court has 90 days to issue a ruling.

Leaders of Wake CARES, the group that sued over year-round schools, are suspicious that the school district would be quick to use a favorable ruling to drop the consent forms.

"The school board is not above doing anything they think will protect their interests," said Dawn Graff, a co-founder of Wake CARES.

But school board members stressed that it's not a given they'll ignore asking for consent this summer if they win the appeal.

"My hope is that the Court of Appeals will rule before the consent forms are sent," said school board member Kevin Hill. "If and when a ruling is issued, I feel very confident that the school board will take a very careful look at what direction to take."

keung.hui@newsobserver.com or (919) 829-4534
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company