News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Sailor's photos became icons of Guantanamo

Published: Jan 13, 2008 12:00 AM
Modified: Jan 13, 2008 01:43 AM

Sailor's photos became icons of Guantanamo

Pentagon sent them out, wishes it hadn't

 

Story Tools

Advertisements
WASHINGTON - The first surprise may be that the most enduring images of the prison camps at Guantanamo were taken by a U.S. sailor doing his job.

Second is that Navy Petty Officer Shane McCoy didn't look through a viewfinder to photograph the captives in shackles on their knees as Army guards hovered nearby.

He set a timer, hoisted his Navy-issue digital camera on a stick -- a monopod -- and it clicked.

"I've seen them in magazines, on television, on the Internet," said McCoy, 33, now ending a 14-year Navy career. "If I do a search for my name, there's like 16,000 hits on those photos. They're everywhere."

Six years ago, McCoy took those now-iconic images of the first detainees to land at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba -- capturing a moment of men on their knees in orange jumpsuits behind barbed wire fences.

Too late to pull them back

And, much to the Pentagon's chagrin, the images won't go away.

The date was Jan. 11, 2002, and homemade snapshots of guards tormenting nude detainees in Abu Ghraib, Iraq, were two years away. News photographers in Baghdad had yet to swarm around toppling Saddam Hussein statues.

In remote Guantanamo, Marine Brig. Gen. Michael Lehnert told a handful of reporters that the nascent prison project was getting "the worst of the worst" of Taliban and al-Qaida prisoners from Afghanistan, 8,000 miles away.

McCoy was assigned to Combat Camera, an elite unit that took secret pictures not for the public but the Pentagon leaders. He was the only photographer allowed that day at Camp X-Ray, the first of a series of prison camps that across six years would hold and interrogate more than 750 captives, with 275 there today.

He was outside a makeshift, open-air holding compound where the captives were kept on their way to registration for the camp -- now defunct after housing 300 men and boys in the earliest days.

The sailor said it was just another job: Take pictures. Choose some. Write captions. Send them to Washington.

The next thing he knew, they were on CNN -- a week later.

Pentagon's reassurance

That's because at the Pentagon, the Bush administration was debating how to reassure the world that its evolving detention strategy was humane -- if not exactly in keeping with the Geneva Conventions by policy, then in keeping with what commanders would come to call "its spirit."

So, as then-spokeswoman Torie Clarke wrote in her memoirs, "Lipstick on a Pig," releasing pictures that didn't show detainees' faces seemed like the smart thing to do.

Pentagon policy to this day dictates that by shielding a Guantanamo detainee's face from view -- blurring it, chopping him off at his beard, or in that instance, hidden beneath a cap, surgical mask and blindfold -- spares a captive humiliation banned by the Geneva Conventions.

"Did I ever misread what was in those photos," she wrote. "The problem wasn't that we released too much, it was that we explained too little ... which allowed other critics to say we were forcing the detainees into poses of subjugation."

Photo not full context

But lost in the furious reaction, said McCoy, was that detainees "simply weren't kept like that."

"They were wearing gloves because it was cold," McCoy said. "I mean, they were flying at 30,000 feet in an unheated back part of the plane; they were wearing hats for the same reason. They did say the goggles were blacked out so they couldn't communicate and plan to attack a guard -- it made sense to me."

U.S. military officials won't identify the first 20 men who arrived at the base -- shown in the photo.


Next page >

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.

Get $150+ in coupons in every Sunday N&O. Click here for convenient home delivery.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company