Today, three new county commissioners who favor slower, planned growth take office, having unseated a majority that was more receptive to development.

That unseating took place in May, in the Democratic primary; in a county dominated by Democrats, that was the election that counted.

But the ousted commissioners didn't go quietly. They used their seven-month lame-duck period to approve hundreds of new homes, enter long-term contracts and award millions of dollars in economic incentives.

The commissioners-in-waiting and their supporters could only howl in helpless protest.

"There were a lot of decisions made that we did not agree with," incoming Commissioner George Lucier said. "It was very frustrating."

The lame ducks say they were just carrying out their mission for the county before they left office.

"If people want additional sheriff's cars and more teachers, someone has to pay for it," said the board's outgoing chairman, Bunkey Morgan.

Though still mostly rural, Chatham County is slowly being drawn into the Triangle's orbit. Situated to Wake County's southwest, its population is approaching 60,000.

In the past few years, the commissioners have approved nearly 7,000 new homes, mostly in northeast Chatham south of Chapel Hill.

As the development increased, slow-growth supporters organized to prevent the landscape from being overwhelmed by subdivisions, strip malls and traffic.

After the last commissioners' election in 2004, representatives from several residents' groups formed the Chatham Coalition, and members began to raise money for slow-growth candidates.

So when the spring primary came around this year, everyone knew it would be a fight.

Morgan, a car-wash entrepreneur, prepared for battle by lending himself $50,000 -- the most a Chatham County commissioner candidate has ever had in campaign funds. And he raised additional money, including $14,000 in donations from eight Wake County developers and real estate lawyers.

The coalition made those donations a campaign issue, pointing out that Morgan did not receive contributions from anyone inside Chatham.

Incumbent Tommy Emerson also was trying to keep his seat in the primary. Commissioner Carl Outz didn't run for re-election. Mary Nettles, a longtime leader of the county Democratic party, campaigned for his seat.

The new guys

The slow-growth groups got behind three challengers -- Lucier, Tom Vanderbeck and Carl Thompson. All three said they wanted the county to follow its land-use plan, which suggests where development can go and how fast. It was adopted in 2001, but it is an advisory document, not binding on the commissioners.

On May 2, the slow-growth challengers won, each receiving more than 55 percent of the vote.

Only Vanderbeck faced a Republican challenger in November, meaning Lucier and Thompson were all but elected.

Rush of commitments

Over the summer, the commissioners' agendas were stuffed with new developments and other business.

At one meeting in July, the board held 11 separate public hearings for new development proposals.

Morgan also led the board to approve a $32 million water contract with Harnett County, even after Lucier, Thompson and Vanderbeck publicly asked the board to hold off. They wanted to explore other, cheaper options, such as getting another intake at Jordan Lake or investing in the towns' water systems.

In addition, the board granted County Manager Charlie Horne a four-year contract that will cost hundreds of thousands of dollars if the new board wants to get rid of him. Horne had worked for Chatham County for 10 years and has not had a contract until now.

In August, the outgoing board members moved on to new things that made their opponents squawk even louder.

They redrew the district lines for county commissioners and placed a proposal on the November ballot to change commissioners' elections from countywide to districtwide. Under existing rules, commissioners are elected countywide, but represent districts and must live in their district.

Morgan said he made the proposals because he had "promised people four years ago that I would do this."

Predictably, Morgan's opponents questioned his motives. The new district map created a scenario that would have allowed Morgan to run in his district in two years instead of four.

"If it was such a good idea," Lucier said, "they should have done it in 2002 when they were first elected."

In the middle of the district-voting brouhaha, the board held a public hearing on whether to give nearly $3 million in incentives to entice Maryland-based ISP Minerals Inc. to open a rock quarry near Siler City.

Siler City approved the rezoning request in July. Residents living near the site say dust from the crushed rock will harm their health and ruin business for a nearby winery.

After hours of testimony from residents asking the board not to give ISP the money, the three outgoing board members voted for the incentives.

Undoing to do

Last month, voters elected Vanderbeck commissioner and rejected the district-voting measure.

Incoming commissioners say they hope some of the decisions can be overturned.

"We can't turn back the clock on everything, but if it should and can be reversed, we will certainly do that," Lucier said. "You have to be patient with these things and realize this is politics -- and not politics at its best."

The outgoing commissioners won't attend today's swearing-in ceremony. They took their plaques and said their good-byes a week early.

Don't count on Morgan's disappearing.

Asked if he'll run again, Morgan said, "I don't know, but I've learned to never say never."

Get $150+ in coupons in every Sunday N&O. Click here for convenient home delivery.