'); } -->
I was somewhat dismayed when I read about the defeat of the transfer tax in the 16 counties that had it on the ballot. Tim Kent, chief executive of the N.C. Association of Realtors, said at a news conference in Raleigh, "Last night was an incredible victory for home-ownership and the protection of private property rights in our state."
I understand Kent's wish to avoid a tax that targets sales from which he makes a living, but his comment is ridiculous. "Home ownership" involves much more than paying a one-time tax when a home is purchased.
"Property tax is a fairer way to pay for public needs" is what other opponents were quoted as saying. But property tax is paid every year, not just once when the home is purchased. If a transfer tax is paid by the seller instead of the buyer and with nearly 100 percent of property sold for more than it originally cost, the tax is paid from the gross profit of the seller, not cash that a buyer would have to save or borrow.
And since when did "private property rights" get protection from real estate taxes?
Winston Hooker Sr.
Cary
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.