News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Goodyear could get $40 million

Published: Aug 04, 2007 12:00 AM
Modified: Aug 04, 2007 04:13 AM

Goodyear could get $40 million

State offers incentives package if the tiremaker stays in Cumberland County

 

Story Tools

AN OVERVIEW

Other businesses also benefited during the legislative session. A few significant victories:

TAX CUTS: The legislature agreed to phase out over four years the sales and excise taxes that manufacturers and farmers pay on the energy they buy to run their operations. It's intended to make them more competitive. The state could give up more than $32 million annually when the taxes are abolished.

TAX REVIEWS: Legislation simplified the process for tax disputes. It was a priority for business owners, according to the N.C. Chamber, the state's largest business lobby.

FASTER REVIEWS: The General Assembly removed a requirement that industrial machinery be evaluated by building inspectors. Recruiters and companies had complained that the provision slowed expansions and hurt economic development.

Advertisements
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. could get as much as $40 million from the state over 10 years if it keeps producing in Fayetteville -- even if it lays off workers.

Before adjourning, the General Assembly approved a new incentive program written to sway one of Cumberland County's largest private employers as it considers factory closings and expansions.

Goodyear would have to invest at least $200 million in its factory to get the assistance. But it would not have to create any jobs or keep all 2,750 existing positions.

"Goodyear has been a wonderful corporate citizen in our part of the state," said Sen. Tony Rand, a Fayetteville Democrat and one of the legislature's most powerful members. "It makes a great deal of sense to keep one of our most important industrial citizens."

The incentive comes as Goodyear trims domestic production of low-end tires in favor of more profitable models.

Last year, the company said that it would stop making about 10 brands of tires -- some made in Fayetteville -- sold under the names of wholesale customers. Since that time, the company has also announced plans to end tire production at a factory in Canada and close a Texas plant.

Goodyear's decisions angered unionized workers, who went on strike last year. Its actions have also sparked fears in several U.S. communities, where leaders worry that they could lose a major employer.

Officials in Alabama and Tennessee have cobbled together incentives packages to entice Goodyear to upgrade plants instead of shutting them down.

"Everybody spends a lot of money to bring these kinds of plants in," said Jim Cooper, executive director of the Obion County Joint Economic Development Council in Tennessee. Goodyear employs about 2,500 at a plant there in Union City.

"Not a whole lot of emphasis is put on keeping them," he said. "When one gets in front of the bull's-eye, you had better do what you can to keep from losing it."

Goodyear has not yet made any investment decisions, said Richard Evans, a spokesman for Goodyear in Fayetteville. And it won't get N.C. assistance unless it chooses to invest in the state.

N.C. leaders see it as a competition.

They want a lucrative package, in case Goodyear only upgrades one facility. Cumberland and Fayetteville officials also have discussed enticements but have not disclosed them, said Phyllis Owens, executive vice president of the Cumberland County Business Council.

Cooper estimated that the concessions approved in Tennessee would be worth about $20 million. Alabama officials could not be reached.

The legislation approved by the N.C. General Assembly sets aside $4 million a year and does not specifically name Goodyear. To qualify for a grant, a company must apply and agree to invest $200 million by 2012. It must already employ at least 2,000 full-time employees and maintain at least that number for as long as a decade.

Rand and Owens said that the legislation was introduced with Goodyear in mind. During the process, language was included to split the $40 million pool of funds among as many as five companies. But with the specific investment, employment and other requirements, few, if any, other companies would likely qualify.

"We're disappointed," said Dan MacDonald, a spokesman with Bridgestone/Firestone, a rival tire manufacturer that has 2,179 employees and contractors at a plant in Wilson. "We stand ready to work with the state to correct this so we can compete in a challenging and competitive global environment."

The legislation marks a shift in incentives policies in the state and is likely to draw the ire of critics. Typically, North Carolina has awarded grants and other aid to businesses that agree to invest in new facilities and create jobs.

The new legislation aims to retain jobs, not bring new ones.

"We don't think that's a good idea," said Dean Webster, executive director of the N.C. Institute for Constitutional Law, which has fought previous incentives agreements in court. "It's either: You open the floodgates, or there are certain favored entities that get it. Either way, it's problematic."

For Rand, action was a given.

Goodyear, and its predecessor companies, have had operations in the area for more than three decades. The average annual wage at the plant exceeds $50,000, and jobs come with benefits worth thousands more, he said. And a $200 million investment would be equivalent to a new facility.

"We see what's been done for Dell and Google," he said. "This is a massive economic engine."

Staff writer Jonathan B. Cox can be reached at 836-4948 or jonathan.cox@newsobserver.com.

Get $150+ in coupons in every Sunday N&O. Click here for convenient home delivery.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company