News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Tar Heel Tally

Published: Jul 06, 2008 12:30 AM
Modified: Jul 06, 2008 02:03 AM

Tar Heel Tally

How North Carolina lawmakers voted in Contress the week of June 23

 

Story Tools

Advertisements
U.S. HOUSE

n DISABILITIES ACT EXPANSION: Voting 402 for and 17 against, the House on June 25 passed a bill (HR 3195) to negate Supreme Court decisions that have narrowed the types of disabilities and number of disabled workers protected by the 1990 Americans With Disabilities Act. The court has denied protection, for example, to people who have taught themselves to perform their jobs and conduct other major activities even though afflicted by diseases such as epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, cancer and diabetes. The bill awaits Senate action. No member spoke against the bill. A yes vote was to pass the bill.

VOTING YES: G.K. Butterfield, D-1; Bob Etheridge, D-2; Walter Jones, R-3; David Price, D-4; Virginia Foxx, R-5; Howard Coble, R-6; Mike McIntyre, D-7; Robin Hayes, R-8; Sue Myrick, R-9; Patrick McHenry, R-10; Heath Shuler , D-11; Melvin Watt, D-12; Brad Miller, D-13

n CHILD-ABUSE PROGRAMS: Voting 318 for and 103 against, the House on June 25 passed a bill (HR 6358) that would authorize nearly $1 billion through fiscal 2013 for federal programs to prevent and deal with the consequences of child abuse. The bill would set federal health and safety standards for residential treatment facilities that oversee teenagers with behavioral or emotional problems or mental-health disorders. The bill is now before the Senate. A yes vote was to pass the bill.

VOTING YES: Butterfield, Etheridge, Jones, Price, McIntyre, Hayes, Shuler, Watt, Miller

VOTING NO: Foxx, Coble, Myrick, McHenry

n MEDICARE DOCTOR PAYMENTS: Voting 355 for and 59 against, the House on June 24 passed a bill (HR 6331) that would avert the administration's 10.6 percent cut in Medicare payments set for July 1. The bill would increase those payments by 1.1 percent in January. The bill also would lower the copayment rate for mental-health coverage from 50 percent to 20 percent, the same rate as for physical care. The bill's projected $19.8 billion, six-year cost would be offset mainly by cuts in the privately run, federally subsidized Medicare Advantage program. A yes vote was to pass the bill.

VOTING YES: Butterfield, Etheridge, Jones, Price, Foxx, Coble, McIntyre, Hayes, Myrick, Shuler, Watt, Miller

VOTING NO: McHenry

n ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX: Voting 233 for and 189 against, the House on June 25 sent the Senate a bill (HR 6275) to exempt 22 million middle-income households from the Alternative Minimum Tax this year. To offset the Treasury's loss of $61.5 billion in revenue, the bill would, in part, repeal certain tax breaks for oil and gas companies; change "carried interest" rules so that managers of investment partnerships and hedge funds would pay taxes at a 35 percent rather than 15 percent rate, and set the stage for more timely tax collection on payments from credit card firms to merchants. A yes vote was to pass the bill.

VOTING YES: Butterfield, Etheridge, Jones, Price, McIntyre, Hayes, Shuler, Watt, Miller

VOTING NO: Foxx, Coble, Myrick, McHenry

n GOP TAX PLAN: Voting 199 for and 222 against, the House on June 25 defeated a GOP bid to strip HR 6275 (above) of $61.5 billion in tax increases on certain equity managers and corporations, including oil companies. Democrats proposed the increases to pay for the bill's fix of the Alternative Minimum Tax in 2008. The GOP motion also sought to raise the mileage deduction for the use of personal vehicles for charitable purposes. A yes vote backed the GOP motion.

VOTING YES: Jones, Foxx, Coble, McIntyre, Hayes, Myrick, McHenry

VOTING NO: Butterfield, Etheridge, Price, Shuler, Watt, Miller


Next page >

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company