News & Observer | newsobserver.com | B City & State

Published: Dec 03, 2006 12:00 AM
Modified: Dec 03, 2006 01:53 AM

High court's eyes on Wake schools

A Supreme Court case might consider Wake's decisions on race's role in school assignments

 

Story Tools

SOME KEY POINTS

* In both cases facing Supreme Court consideration on Monday, parents argue that the use of race, even on a voluntary basis, violates the equal protection guarantees in the 14th Amendment.

* Seattle's assignment plan lets students choose their preferred high schools. For those schools where requests exceed space, the district gives first priority to siblings of current students and then in some cases considers race.

* The district's most recent rules call for race to serve as a tiebreaker in schools that are more than 65 percent white or 75 percent minority. Because of the litigation, the district hasn't used race in assigning students since 2002.

* The Louisville case involves the Jefferson County school district, which includes Louisville, where a parent is challenging a plan designed to give each school a black enrollment of between 15 percent and 50 percent.

* Federal appeals courts have upheld the plans in both districts. A ruling by the Supreme Court is expected in mid-2007.

Advertisements


< Previous page

Retired Wake schools Superintendent Bill McNeal said local schools with high concentrations of poor and minority students have performed well, but he questions how long that can be sustained. A court ruling allowing the use of race could only help districts trying to foster diversity, said McNeal, now executive director of the N.C. Association of School Administrators.

"It would remove the chilling effect and put one more tool in the hands of districts to ensure the kind of schools we want our own children to attend," McNeal said.

The court case will probably have no effect on the few districts still under court-ordered desegregation plans, legal experts say, because it affects only districts that use race voluntarily.

Ashley Osment, a lawyer for the UNC Center for Civil Rights, said a court ruling allowing districts to consider race would lift the legal threat that's often raised.

"No longer could people say you're not allowed to use race," she said. "If we want a system that is not two-tiered, these are issues we have to confront head-on."

Wake school board members might disagree on reopening the issue of race if the court affirms its use.

Beverley Clark, a strong supporter of the current approach, said the policy is intended to ensure that all schools are "healthy and strong."

"But clearly we would want to look at all those factors that are within our control to make sure that all schools are healthy and attractive," she said.

Ron Margiotta, a board member who favors neighborhood schools, said he thinks the current policy is vulnerable to legal challenge as a proxy for race. He said he's unconcerned about schools with too many poor or minority students, as long as students are performing academically.

"I'm not sure that [racially diverse enrollments] are the responsibility of the school system," Margiotta said. "It is the responsibility of the school system to educate children."


< Previous page

Staff writer Todd Silberman can be reached at 829-4531 or todds@newsobserver.com.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company