News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Getting answers

Published: Jul 23, 2008 12:30 AM
Modified: Jul 23, 2008 01:23 AM

Getting answers

Heavy use of private contractors in war zones raises questions for a Congress concerned about its oversight role

Story Tools

Advertisements
Considering that individual private contractors in Afghanistan and Iraq outnumber U.S. troops in those countries, Congress has every right to know what the privateers are up to and to set rules for what they can do. At present, there are glaring gaps in both areas.

Take, for example, a troubling aspect of private contracting that has just come to light. It involves secret programs for assisting intelligence agents in war zones. According to a Wall Street Journal report, "these contractors have carried out some of the government's most sensitive work -- conducting interrogations, manning secret prisons and guarding spy-agency personnel."

A provision passed by the U.S. House last week sensibly attempts to ban or limit some of those practices. The measure, from U.S. Reps. David Price of Chapel Hill and Jan Schakowsky of Illinois, would prohibit contractors for the intelligence community from interrogating detainees. And it calls for an official report on the use of contractors by intelligence agencies.

The bill that Price's provision is part of is headed to the Senate, but the White House isn't waiting for final action. Citing the contractor-interrogation provision, it says President Bush will veto the larger intelligence bill if the final version includes the interrogation provision. There should be no prohibition on private contractors participating in lawful interrogations conducted by the CIA, the White House says.

That's consistent with the Bush administration's support for its practice of outsourcing much of the war-related effort in Iraq and Afghanistan, where contractors currently outnumber U.S. troops 202,000 to 186,000.

Most of those employees, to be sure, work in troop-support activities such as logistics and reconstruction. But many do not -- a fact North Carolinians know well because of controversial, sometimes deadly actions by employees of Blackwater Worldwide, based in Moyock, which provides armed security to diplomats in Iraq. It's likely that the presence of Blackwater originally piqued Price's interest in the contractor issue (the company says it is not involved in interrogations).

Now the 10-term Democrat is calling for a hard look at "the contracting of sensitive intelligence operations to private companies" to make sure that inherently governmental activities aren't being outsourced to unaccountable "corporate, for-profit contractors."

With about half of the intelligence budget contracted out, and with little known about where the money goes or whether outsourcing actually aids taxpayers, the House intelligence bill calls for a detailed report from the administration. It's about time. As Price says, contractors may have a place in intelligence activities, but their role must "carefully considered, thoroughly managed, and strenuously overseen."

Speaking of oversight -- Price is also calling for an investigation by Congress of Aero Contractors of Johnston County. This private air service with close links to the CIA reportedly has transported detainees to foreign countries that are known to use torture.

Price says he wants to know the facts about Aero, with a view to shutting down what are called "extraordinary renditions." If the facts support the allegations -- and there seems little doubt that abuses have occurred -- that is the least Congress could do.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company