News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Dispute of USOC's revenue share heating up

The Associated Press

Published: Thu, Apr. 10, 2008 12:12PM

Modified Thu, Apr. 10, 2008 12:13PM

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

BEIJING -- The dispute over the U.S. Olympic Committee's share of global Olympic revenues is heating up.

Under a long-standing deal with the International Olympic Committee, the USOC receives nearly 13 percent of U.S. TV rights fees and 20 percent of global marketing revenues.

Criticism of the arrangement flared into the open Thursday at a joint meeting of the IOC executive board and the body that represents the world's 205 national Olympic associations.

The Association of National Olympic Committees adopted a resolution saying it was "totally incorrect and unacceptable" that an IOC member took his complaint about the revenue issue publicly to all the bodies.

That occurred when Denis Oswald, an IOC executive board member from Switzerland who heads the association of Olympic sports federations, sent a letter to all national Olympic bodies on March 7 saying it was "no longer morally acceptable" for the USOC to receive such a large cut of Olympic funds.

USOC president Peter Ueberroth complained to the IOC earlier this week that the letter was "badly spirited" and an attempt to attack the United States and Chicago's bid for the 2016 Olympics.

Under international pressure to reduce the U.S. share, the IOC and USOC have been in talks for more than a year on finding a new revenue-sharing formula.

Bob Ctvrtlik, a U.S. IOC member who is the USOC's international vice president, said the IOC should "not allow anything disrespectful" to Ueberroth.

He said the USOC had submitted written proposals on the revenue issue and would continue to work "in good faith" to reach an agreement.

Oswald took the floor and said the circumstances that led to the USOC deal 20 years ago had changed and the formula was unacceptable to the federations.

"The international federations are not satisfied and they will continue demanding a reopening of the debate," he said. "We figured the whole of the Olympic family needed to be informed of this position.

"Some people may dislike the procedure we adopted for this," he added. "I apologize for this. There was no intention to insult or hurt anyone. We simply wished to make our position known."

IOC president Jacques Rogge said he would appoint Oswald and ANOC chief Mario Vazquez Rana of Mexico to a panel to negotiate a solution.

Ueberroth was in Beijing earlier this week but flew to San Francisco for Wednesday's leg of the Beijing torch relay.

He told The Associated Press last year that the USOC was not working with the IOC for an agreement.

"We've said we will share more if we agree to grow the pie," Ueberroth said. "If we hold the pie steady and shrink it, and you want to fight for little percentages here and there, that's not going to do anybody any good. We need to work together. There's a chance to double the pie."

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.