2012 grads: Honor yours Photos: American Idol | Day's Best | Scenes from Cannes | Nightlife | High school sports
Washed Away: First of three parts: State programs intended to offset environmental damage from development have spent roughly $140 million on work that is failing, needs significant repair or is too far away from distressed sources of drinking water.
Modified: 11/20/11 05:24:26 PMWashed Away: Second of three parts: Money that the state spends on projects to reduce pollution from nitrogen has gone toward improvements far downstream and outside the watersheds of the Triangle's two biggest sources of drinking water: Falls and Jordan lakes.
Modified: 11/20/11 05:24:26 PMWashed Away: Third of three parts: Studies of what seemed a logical solution to the destruction of streams by road builders and developers have found that 20 years of applying common restoration methods - often at public expense - is doing little good.
Modified: 11/20/11 05:24:26 PMCreating a viable stream is a difficult challenge. Engineers must consider population, topography, buffer zones and vegetation, among other factors. How well would you do?
Modified: 04/16/11 11:05:47 PMThe state has spent about $140 million on 79 stream and wetland restoration projects that are failing, need significant repair or are too far away from drinking water sources harmed by development.
Modified: 11/20/11 05:24:26 PMState lawmakers late Thursday passed legislation that could put an end to a long string of costly, state-supported fixes of stream restoration projects by shifting to construction methods that hold the companies that build the projects accountable.
Modified: 06/19/11 06:32:53 AMThere has been a growing mantra among state lawmakers, environmentalists and others to privatize the production of restored streams and wetlands to offset the impacts of development.
Modified: 05/01/11 09:57:25 AMA plan developed by the state in 2001 for environmental restoration was a boon to conservation groups that had thousands of acres to sell for mitigation.
Modified: 11/20/11 05:24:26 PMLongtime college basketball analyst Billy Packer has called a foul on N.C. environmental enforcers.
Modified: 04/22/11 12:24:17 AMTop lawmakers say they need to take a deep look at the state's efforts to restore streams and wetlands because of projects that are failing, long delayed or too far away from the development damage they are intended to offset.
Modified: 11/20/11 05:24:26 PMABOUT THIS SERIES
This three-part report reveals that a state program to offset environmental damage from development isn't effective. Roughly $140 million has been spent on work that is failing, needs significant repair or is too far away from distressed sources of drinking water.
DAY ONE: The state spends millions with little effect, but the environmental-protection program keeps roads on track.
DAY TWO: $13 million in offset fees spent by Triangle developers and governments don't help keep Falls or Jordan lakes clean.
DAY THREE: Doubts grow about stream restoration efforts. Improving water quality is not a measure of success.
LEARN BY DOING
Take the stream restoration challenge. (Flash project courtesy of reesenews.org.)
See an interactive database of troubled restoration projects throughout North Carolina.
MORE RESOURCES
ILLUSTRATION: How does development pollute?
MAP: Little Beaver Creek - what went wrong
MAP: Reducing nitrogen, but not at Falls Lake
CHART: Getting payments in under the wire
PHOTOS: Environmentally damaged creeks
PHOTOS: Falls Lake, other Triangle waterways
STAFF CREDITS
Reporting: Dan Kane and David Raynor
Database: David Raynor
Photos: Chuck Liddy, Shawn Rocco, Chris Seward
Maps and illustrations: Tim Lee
Editor: Steve Riley | Design: Tim Myers
Copy editor: Burgetta Wheeler
Online: Bob Brueckner, Andrew Roman
Developers and government regulators say it would be too expensive to significantly monitor the long-term results of stream restoration projects.
Modified: 04/20/11 07:50:54 PMIn 1999, the state Department of Transportation paid $5.3 million for more than 400 acres of restored and preserved wetland in eastern Pitt County, just north of the Tar River.
Modified: 04/16/11 11:25:41 PMTwo state audits of environmental restoration sites, which are intended to offset water pollution caused by development, found failing projects and a general lack of accountability.
Modified: 04/16/11 11:29:36 PMThe groundskeeper in Caddyshack grappled with a gopher. The state of North Carolina is in a battle with beavers.
Modified: 04/19/11 10:47:21 PMContact the N&O newsroom
Thad Ogburn, metro editor
(919) 829-8987
Richard Stradling, deputy metro editor
(919) 829-4739
Deborah Jackson, night metro editor
(919) 829-8920
Newsroom main number: (919) 829-4520
Get local news updates
Keep up with the latest stories with our free local news e-mail newsletters, delivered straight to your inbox!
Subscribe to Afternoon Update - it's free!
Subscribe to Breaking News - it's free!
Subscribe to Local & State News - it's free!
Subscribe to Today at a Glance - it's free!
Subscribe to Crime & Safety - it's free!
Subscribe to Education - it's free!
Subscribe to Health & Science - it's free!








