Washed Away

Breaking News } Flash flood watch for Johnston County

The National Weather Service has issued a flash flood watch for Johnston County, in effect until 6 p.m. Learn more...

Washed Away: Second of three parts:  Money that the state spends on projects to reduce pollution from nitrogen has gone toward improvements far downstream and outside the watersheds of the Triangle's two biggest sources of drinking water: Falls and Jordan lakes.

Modified: 11/20/11 05:24:26 PM
gallery
Washed Away Day 2 | 04.17.11
PDF
Reducing nitrogen, but not at Falls Lake
PDF
Getting in under the wire
Story
Map: Troubled restoration projects
Story
Take the stream restoration challenge

Washed Away: Third of three parts:  Studies of what seemed a logical solution to the destruction of streams by road builders and developers have found that 20 years of applying common restoration methods - often at public expense - is doing little good.

Modified: 11/20/11 05:24:26 PM
Story
Busy beavers muck up state's best efforts
Story
When wetland projects pollute
Story
Take the stream restoration challenge
Story
Map: Troubled restoration projects
Link
Read more stories in the Washed Away series

Creating a viable stream is a difficult challenge. Engineers must consider population, topography, buffer zones and vegetation, among other factors. How well would you do?

Modified: 04/16/11 11:05:47 PM

The state has spent about $140 million on 79 stream and wetland restoration projects that are failing, need significant repair or are too far away from drinking water sources harmed by development.

Modified: 11/20/11 05:24:26 PM
Link
Read more stories in the Washed Away series
Link
Find more databases at Data Central

State lawmakers late Thursday passed legislation that could put an end to a long string of costly, state-supported fixes of stream restoration projects by shifting to construction methods that hold the companies that build the projects accountable.

Modified: 06/19/11 06:32:53 AM
Link
Read more stories in the Washed Away series

There has been a growing mantra among state lawmakers, environmentalists and others to privatize the production of restored streams and wetlands to offset the impacts of development.

Modified: 05/01/11 09:57:25 AM
Link
Read more stories in the Washed Away series

A plan developed by the state in 2001 for environmental restoration was a boon to conservation groups that had thousands of acres to sell for mitigation.

Modified: 11/20/11 05:24:26 PM
Story
Sports analyst Packer fights fine levied by state
Story
Take the stream restoration challenge
Story
Map: Troubled restoration projects
Link
Read more stories in the Washed Away series

Longtime college basketball analyst Billy Packer has called a foul on N.C. environmental enforcers.

Modified: 04/22/11 12:24:17 AM

Top lawmakers say they need to take a deep look at the state's efforts to restore streams and wetlands because of projects that are failing, long delayed or too far away from the development damage they are intended to offset.

Modified: 11/20/11 05:24:26 PM
Story
Take the stream restoration challenge
Story
Map: Troubled restoration projects
Link
Read more stories in the Washed Away series

ABOUT THIS SERIES

This three-part report reveals that a state program to offset environmental damage from development isn't effective. Roughly $140 million has been spent on work that is failing, needs significant repair or is too far away from distressed sources of drinking water.

DAY ONE: The state spends millions with little effect, but the environmental-protection program keeps roads on track.

DAY TWO: $13 million in offset fees spent by Triangle developers and governments don't help keep Falls or Jordan lakes clean.

DAY THREE: Doubts grow about stream restoration efforts. Improving water quality is not a measure of success.


LEARN BY DOING

interactive project: build your own restored stream

Take the stream restoration challenge. (Flash project courtesy of reesenews.org.)


interactive database of troubled projects

See an interactive database of troubled restoration projects throughout North Carolina.


MORE RESOURCES

ILLUSTRATION: How does development pollute?

MAP: Little Beaver Creek - what went wrong

MAP: Reducing nitrogen, but not at Falls Lake

CHART: Getting payments in under the wire

PHOTOS: Environmentally damaged creeks

PHOTOS: Falls Lake, other Triangle waterways


STAFF CREDITS

Reporting: Dan Kane and David Raynor

Database: David Raynor

Photos: Chuck Liddy, Shawn Rocco, Chris Seward

Maps and illustrations: Tim Lee

Editor: Steve Riley | Design: Tim Myers

Copy editor: Burgetta Wheeler

Online: Bob Brueckner, Andrew Roman

Developers and government regulators say it would be too expensive to significantly monitor the long-term results of stream restoration projects.

Modified: 04/20/11 07:50:54 PM

In 1999, the state Department of Transportation paid $5.3 million for more than 400 acres of restored and preserved wetland in eastern Pitt County, just north of the Tar River.

Modified: 04/16/11 11:25:41 PM

Two state audits of environmental restoration sites, which are intended to offset water pollution caused by development, found failing projects and a general lack of accountability.

Modified: 04/16/11 11:29:36 PM

The groundskeeper in Caddyshack grappled with a gopher. The state of North Carolina is in a battle with beavers.

Modified: 04/19/11 10:47:21 PM

Contact the N&O newsroom

Thad Ogburn, metro editor
(919) 829-8987

Richard Stradling, deputy metro editor
(919) 829-4739

Deborah Jackson, night metro editor
(919) 829-8920

Newsroom main number: (919) 829-4520

All newsroom contacts

Get local news updates

Keep up with the latest stories with our free local news e-mail newsletters, delivered straight to your inbox!

- it's free!

- it's free!

- it's free!

- it's free!

- it's free!

- it's free!

- it's free!

Hot Deals View All
Find a Car
Go
Top Jobs View All

Find a Job
Go
Featured Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

News Blogs & Columnists

Print Ads