Judges side with NC Gov. Josh Stein in challenge over filling judicial vacancies
AI-generated summary reviewed by our newsroom.
- Judges ruled limits on Gov. Josh Stein’s judicial vacancy powers unconstitutional.
- Court upheld legislature’s changes to Utilities Commission and Code Council roles.
- Decision follows prior loss for Stein over State Board of Elections appointments.
A panel of Superior Court judges sided with Democratic Gov. Josh Stein on Tuesday in his effort to block a new law limiting his ability to fill vacancies on the state’s appellate courts.
“Plaintiff has demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt that the amendments ... are unconstitutional and is entitled to judgment as matter of law on that claim,” the unanimous panel wrote in a brief order.
However, the court declined to block other sections of the bill that strip Stein of some authority over the Utilities Commission and Building Code Council.
Stein’s lawsuit, which was initially filed in February, targeted several provisions of a massive power shift bill — Senate Bill 382 — passed by the lame duck legislature last year in the final days of Republicans’ veto-proof supermajority.
The bill would have limited Stein’s ability to fill vacancies on the state’s Court of Appeals and Supreme Court by requiring him to pick from a list of three nominees selected by the political party of the departing judge.
In court filings, Stein argued that the change was unconstitutional and forced him to fill vacancies with judges “handpicked by partisan political operatives.”
Republican leaders, who defended the law in court, argued that the provision keeps courts aligned with the choices of voters.
“Closely aligning the affiliation of vacancy appointment to that of the vacating jurist maximizes — not diminishes — the integrity of the democratic process in North Carolina, where the people choose judges for themselves,” they wrote in legal filings. “The wisdom and timing of such a policy choice is for the Legislature, not for counsel or the courts.”
While the judges sided with Stein on this issue, they disagreed with his challenge to other appointment changes.
Part of SB 382 stripped Stein of his ability to appoint a majority of members to the Utilities Commission, giving one of his picks to the Republican state treasurer. Another section prohibited the Building Code Council from meeting or taking action without the support of the legislature’s appointees.
Stein argued that these changes violated the state constitution by chipping away at his executive powers, but lawmakers defended the shifts as a “legitimate exercise of the legislature’s plenary power to establish, organize, and reorganize state agencies.”
The court panel, meeting in Wake County Superior Court and made up of judges who ran as a Democrat, a Republican and an independent, sided with the legislature on these matters without giving its reasoning.
State Treasurer Brad Briner lauded the ruling in a statement on Tuesday.
“This decision affirms that the governor does not have ultimate authority over other duly elected members of the Council of State to carry out their roles and responsibilities as members of the executive branch,” he said. “I was elected treasurer by people across the state to carry out the duties of this office. The judges, to their credit, carefully reviewed the matter, and properly found that the General Assembly is not prohibited from empowering the treasurer to appoint a member to the Utilities Commission.”
The ruling comes just a month after Stein suffered a major court loss related to his appointment powers.
Another section of SB 382 stripped Stein of his authority to appoint members to the State Board of Elections, giving the power instead to the Republican state auditor.
A trial court initially found that law to be unconstitutional, but the state’s Republican-dominated appellate courts later reversed that ruling, allowing it to take effect.
This story was originally published June 24, 2025 at 4:47 PM.
